Table of Contents
A slurry wall, also known as a slurry cut-off wall, is a type of ground engineering technique. It is primarily used to provide an underground low-permeability barrier, preventing the flow of groundwater and other contaminants. [1]
The slurry wall technique was founded in the 1950s by an Italian company called ICOS during the evacuation of the Red Line of the Milan Metro. Over the decades, slurry wall construction has been demonstrated in many well-known engineering projects such as the World Trade Center in New York City. [2]
There are two common types of slurry walls, each designed for specific applications:
Aarsleff’s single-phase, self-hardening slurry trench cut-off walls are constructed by excavating a trench under a cement-bentonite slurry. The slurry remains fluid during excavation, and in this state allows the formation of a filter cake of bentonite on the side walls enabling the hydrostatic pressure of the slurry to prevent the collapse of the trench. Due to the cementitious content, the slurry hardens within about 24 hours to form the low permeability barrier. The hardened slurry has a low permeability, typically 1×10-8 to 1×10-10 m/s and the strength properties of a stiff clay but it does not possess the plastic properties of clay.
Most slurry trench cut-off walls built in the UK are 0.6 m wide. The practical maximum width is 1.5 m, although a more than 1.0 m width is unusual. Trenches can be excavated to about 12-15m deep in most ground conditions using hydraulic back-actors (backhoes). For depths below this and in particularly difficult ground conditions, diaphragm wall grabs or cutters are used. Slurry walls are normally keyed into an aquiclude, an underlying layer of low-permeability material.
Slurry walls are also referred to as diaphragm walls. A diaphragm wall is a reinforced concrete structure cast into the ground to support deep excavation work in basements, tunnel approaches, rail stations, pumping stations and underground car parks. [3]
While slurry walls and diaphragm walls can be used as a groundwater barrier, they have many differences. Diaphragm walls are generally thicker and excavated at depths deeper than slurry walls. For projects that require a supportive and long-lasting structure, diaphragm walls are often used, whereas slurry walls are more suitable as temporary groundwater barriers.
The cost of a slurry wall can vary from project to project. It can depend on a variety of factors:
1. Wall Dimensions
Deeper and thicker walls such as diaphragm walls require more materials and specialised equipment, which can increase costs.
2. Ground Conditions
Sites with complex or challenging ground conditions such as high groundwater levels require specialised techniques or additional testing, raising slurry wall costs.
3. Materials
The type of materials used to build the slurry wall can influence the overall cost. While cement and bentonite or ready-to-mix blends are reasonably priced, higher-quality materials can drive costs. Soil-bentonite slurry walls are generally more cost-effective than cement-bentonite slurry walls as the soil excavated on-site is used instead of cement.
Aside from having very low permeability, slurry walls provide other advantages to sites including:
Sources